Saltar para o conteúdo

Autumn Deals

Contact us,get 5% discount

Welcome to our store

Customer Service 008618100274609

Knowledge

EVE MB31 vs LF356: 3.2V 314Ah and 3.2V 356Ah LiFePO4 Cell Comparison

por li fang chen 28 Sep 2026 0 comentários

When building a DIY residential energy storage system, choosing the right LiFePO4 Cell is one of the most important decisions. Cell capacity, nominal voltage, dimensions, internal resistance, cycle life, charging limits, and mechanical requirements can all affect the final battery design.

The EVE MB31 is a 3.2V 314Ah prismatic LiFePO4 cell with a nominal energy of 1004.8Wh. The newer LF356L, often referred to in searches as LF356, provides a nominal capacity of 356.3Ah and 1140Wh at the same 3.2V nominal voltage.

EVE MB31 and LF356 LiFePO4 cell comparison Technical illustration comparing EVE MB31 3.2V 314Ah and LF356L 3.2V 356.3Ah prismatic LiFePO4 cells. EVE MB31 vs LF356L EVE MB31 3.2V • 314Ah 1004.8Wh LF356L 3.2V • 356.3Ah 1140Wh
Image 1. EVE MB31 vs LF356L technical comparison. Alt text: EVE MB31 3.2V 314Ah and LF356L 3.2V 356.3Ah LiFePO4 Cell comparison.

EVE MB31 Overview

The EVE MB31 is a prismatic LFP rechargeable lithium-ion cell manufactured by EVE Power Co., Ltd. The MB31 product specification identifies it as a prismatic LFP cell with a nominal capacity of 314Ah and a nominal voltage of 3.2V.

The MB31 specification lists a nominal energy of 1004.8Wh, an end-of-charge voltage of 3.65V, standard and maximum continuous charging/discharging power of 0.5P at the specified test condition, an initial internal resistance of 0.18mΩ ±0.05mΩ, and a weight of 5600g ±300g.

  • Nominal capacity: 314Ah
  • Nominal voltage: 3.2V
  • Nominal energy: 1004.8Wh
  • End-of-charge voltage: 3.65V
  • Standard charging power: 0.5P
  • Maximum continuous charging power: 0.5P
  • Standard discharging power: 0.5P
  • Maximum continuous discharging power: 0.5P
  • Initial internal resistance: 0.18mΩ ±0.05mΩ
  • Weight: 5600g ±300g

EVE MB31 Specifications: 3.2V 314Ah LiFePO4 Cell

The term 3.2V 314Ah describes the two fundamental electrical characteristics of the MB31. The 3.2V figure is the nominal voltage, while 314Ah represents the nominal capacity under the conditions defined in EVE's specification.

The MB31 314Ah rating is specified for testing at 25°C ±2°C and 0.5P charge/discharge conditions over a 2.5V to 3.65V range.

EVE MB31 Physical Dimensions

Parameter EVE MB31
Nominal Capacity 314Ah
Nominal Voltage 3.2V
Nominal Energy 1004.8Wh
Height with terminal 207.2 ±0.5mm
Height without terminal 204.6 ±0.5mm
Length 173.7 ±0.5mm
Thickness 71.7 ±0.8mm
Pole center distance 123.0 ±0.3mm
Weight 5600 ±300g

These dimensions matter when designing a battery box, compression structure, busbar arrangement, or DIY battery enclosure. A cell's physical dimensions should be matched with the available enclosure rather than selecting cells based only on capacity.

EVE MB31 Performance and Cycle Life

One of the most important specifications of the EVE MB31 is its stated cycle-life performance. The EVE specification lists 8000 cycles at 25°C and 70% SOH.

This figure is a specified test condition, not a guarantee that every installed battery will achieve exactly 8000 cycles. Actual battery life depends on operating temperature, charge and discharge conditions, depth of discharge, cell matching, BMS configuration, mechanical compression, voltage limits, and thermal management.

The MB31 specification also gives maximum continuous charging and discharging power of 0.5P at 25°C ±2°C under the stated conditions. Its standard charging mode is charging to 3.65V with a constant power of 502.4W.

EVE MB31 vs LF356: Key Differences

The most useful comparison is between the EVE MB31 and LF356/LF356L. Both are 3.2V-class prismatic LFP cells, but the LF356L has a higher nominal capacity.

Specification EVE MB31 EVE LF356L
Cell type Prismatic LFP Prismatic LFP
Nominal voltage 3.2V 3.2V
Nominal capacity 314Ah 356.3Ah
Nominal energy 1004.8Wh 1140Wh
Initial internal resistance 0.18mΩ ±0.05mΩ 0.15mΩ ±0.05mΩ
Weight 5600 ±300g 6220 ±150g
Cycle life 8000 cycles, 70% SOH 8000 cycles, 70% SOH
Standard charge/discharge power 0.5P 0.5P

EVE MB31 vs LF356 Capacity

The MB31 provides 314Ah, whereas LF356L provides 356.3Ah. The difference is 42.3Ah, or approximately 13.5% more nominal capacity for LF356L.

  • MB31: 3.2V × 314Ah = 1004.8Wh
  • LF356L: 3.2V × 356.3Ah = 1140Wh

Therefore, one LF356L cell provides approximately 135.2Wh more nominal energy than one MB31 cell.

EVE MB31 vs LF356 Internal Resistance

The specification lists an initial internal resistance of 0.18mΩ ±0.05mΩ for MB31 and 0.15mΩ ±0.05mΩ for LF356L. These values should be interpreted together with the specified measurement conditions and should not be treated as a complete system-level performance score.

EVE MB31 for DIY Energy Storage

The EVE MB31 is relevant to DIY residential energy storage because a 16S configuration creates a nominal 51.2V battery.

16S EVE MB31 Battery

A typical 16S configuration contains 16 EVE MB31 cells:

16 × 3.2V = 51.2V

With 314Ah cells, the nominal energy is approximately:

51.2V × 314Ah = 16.08kWh

This configuration is commonly associated with 48V-class inverter systems. Actual inverter compatibility depends on the inverter voltage range, charging voltage, current limits, BMS communication requirements, and other electrical specifications.

The EVE cell specification should therefore be treated as a cell-level specification rather than approval for a complete battery system. EVE states that module- and system-level safety compliance requires customer design verification.

EVE MB31 and LF356 Battery Pack Sizing

Capacity is one of the clearest ways to compare these two cells for DIY battery design.

16S EVE MB31

16 × 3.2V = 51.2V

Nominal energy: 51.2V × 314Ah = 16.08kWh

16S LF356

16 × 3.2V = 51.2V

Nominal energy: 51.2V × 356.3Ah = 18.24kWh

The same 16S architecture can therefore provide approximately 16.08kWh with MB31 cells or 18.24kWh with LF356L cells. The nominal system voltage remains 51.2V, while the stored nominal energy changes with cell capacity.

16S EVE MB31 and LF356 battery pack energy comparison Diagram showing 16 cells in series and comparing 51.2V nominal battery energy using EVE MB31 and LF356L cells. 16S Battery Pack Energy Comparison 16S EVE MB31 51.2V • 314Ah • 16.08kWh 16S LF356L 51.2V • 356.3Ah • 18.24kWh
Image 2. 16S nominal energy comparison. Alt text: 16S EVE MB31 51.2V 16.08kWh versus LF356L 51.2V 18.24kWh battery pack.

EVE MB31 LiFePO4 Cell Safety Considerations

The MB31 specification includes cell-level safety tests. Under the specified test conditions, the document reports no fire or explosion for over-charge, over-discharge, external short-circuit, crush, drop, heating, and thermal runaway tests.

Important: Cell-level test results do not automatically establish module- or system-level safety. EVE's specification states that module and system safety compliance requires customer design verification.

BMS

A battery management system should be selected according to series cell count, maximum continuous current, charge current, discharge current, temperature monitoring, protection thresholds, and communication requirements.

Cell Matching

For multi-cell battery construction, capacity, internal resistance, voltage, and SOC consistency should be evaluated before assembly.

Mechanical Compression

Prismatic cells can experience expansion during operation. The battery enclosure should therefore be designed with the manufacturer's mechanical requirements in mind rather than simply holding the cells loosely.

EVE MB31 or LF356: Which Cell Fits Your Battery Design?

The choice between EVE MB31 and LF356 should be based on the requirements of the battery system rather than capacity alone.

EVE MB31 Design Considerations

  • 314Ah cell capacity
  • 3.2V nominal voltage
  • Approximately 1kWh nominal energy per cell
  • 16S 51.2V battery architecture
  • Existing MB31 enclosure designs
  • Existing busbar and BMS layouts
  • Established MB31 battery pack dimensions

LF356 Design Considerations

  • 356.3Ah nominal capacity
  • 3.2V nominal voltage
  • Approximately 1.14kWh nominal energy per cell
  • Higher nominal energy in the same 16S cell count
  • LF356L product specification dated March 2026

The LF356L specification lists 1140Wh nominal energy compared with 1004.8Wh for MB31. Physical dimensions must also be checked before using LF356L as a replacement in an existing MB31 battery enclosure.

EVE MB31 and LF356 FAQ

Is EVE MB31 a 3.2V 314Ah LiFePO4 Cell?

Yes. The EVE MB31 specification identifies a nominal capacity of 314Ah and nominal voltage of 3.2V, with nominal energy of 1004.8Wh.

Is LF356 a 3.2V 356Ah battery cell?

The uploaded EVE specification identifies the product as LF356L, with a nominal capacity of 356.3Ah and nominal voltage of 3.2V. Therefore, “3.2V 356Ah” is a rounded description of the 356.3Ah specification.

How much energy does one EVE MB31 cell store?

The MB31 specification gives a nominal energy of 1004.8Wh, or approximately 1.0kWh per cell.

How much energy does one LF356L cell store?

The LF356L specification gives a nominal energy of 1140Wh, or 1.14kWh per cell.

How many EVE MB31 cells are required for a 51.2V battery?

A 16S configuration uses 16 cells: 16 × 3.2V = 51.2V. With 314Ah cells, the nominal energy is approximately 16.08kWh.

Does EVE MB31 have an 8000-cycle life?

The EVE specification lists 8000 cycles at 25°C and 70% SOH. This is a specified test condition rather than a guarantee that every installed battery will achieve exactly 8000 cycles.

Internal Links

External Resources

Technical Source Notes

Primary source 1: EVE Power Co., Ltd., “Product Specification — Prismatic LFP Cell — Model MB31,” Specification No. PBRI-MB31-D06-01, Version A, November 2023.

Primary source 2: EVE Power Co., Ltd., “Product Specification — Prismatic LFP Cell — Product LF356L,” Specification No. JMRI-LF356L-V1-D06-01, Version A, March 2026.

The MB31 and LF356L specifications are cell-level documents. Battery pack, inverter, BMS, enclosure, transportation, certification, and system-level compliance should be verified separately for the intended application.

Artigo anterior
Artigo seguinte

Deixe um comentário

Todos os comentários do blogue são verificados antes de serem publicados

Obrigado pela sua subscrição!

Este endereço de correio eletrónico já foi registado!

Comprar o conjunto

Escolher opções

Editar opção
Back In Stock Notification
Comparar
Produto SKU Descrição Coleção Disponibilidade Tipo de produto Outros detalhes

Escolher opções

this is just a warning
Iniciar sessão
Carrinho de compras
0 artigos